Moodle Platform Evaluation Questionnaire

Overall structure

1. How clear is the overall structure of the InCrea+ Moodle course? (1 - 5)

2. How clear is the video with explanations on how to navigate within the Moodle course? (1 - 5)

Yes
No

3.1 If you strongly disagree with the previous statement (3), which type of information is missing or is not clearly explained according to you?

Yes
No

4.1 If no, please explain why it is not easily accessible according to you.

Part 1

In this section, please evaluate PART 1 “Theoretical knowledge”, in particular:

Module 1 “Challenges to inclusion in education”

Module 2 “Inclusive education and 21^st Century skills”

Module 3 “Foundations for an inclusive educational artmaking”

4. The level of scientific quality of the content: (1 - 5)

5. The level of content coherence: (1 - 5)

6. The extent to which the content is practical and easy to use (please, consider the language used, the examples, the templates, the good practices, exercises, etc.): (1 - 5)

7. The extent to which the content (including the practical annexes and tools) is considered immediately applicable in your teaching practice? (1 - 5)

Yes
No

8.1 If NO, please explain what else should be included in the material, in order to make it more useful.

9. If your evaluations for the different modules covered by part 1 of this questionnaire, vary substantially, please, explain how, in which areas and why:

10. Additional comments to the questions in Part 1:

Part 2

In this section, please make reference to Part 2 “Activities to promote inclusivity”, in particular:

Module 1 “Inclusivity in the classroom”

Module 2 “Art-based educational activities”

Module 3 “List of activities to be done with pupils”

11. The level of scientific quality of the content: (1 - 5)

12. The level of content coherence: (1 - 5)

13. The extent to which the content is practical and easy to use (please, consider the language used, the examples, the templates, the exercises, etc.): (1 - 5)

14. The extent to which the content (including the practical annexes and tools) is considered immediately applicable in your teaching practice? (1 - 5)

Yes
No

15.1 If NO, please explain what else should be included in the material, in order to make it more useful.

16. If your evaluations for the different modules covered by Part 2 of this questionnaire, vary substantially, please, explain how, in which areas and why:

17. Additional comments to the questions in Part 2:

Part 3

In this section, please refers to Part 3 “Involvement of the community”, in particular: Module 1 “From and for the community”

18. The level of scientific quality of the content: (1 - 5)

19. The level of content coherence: (1 - 5)

20. The extent to which the content is practical and easy to use (please, consider the language used, the examples, the templates, the good practices, exercises, etc.): (1 - 5)

21. The extent to which the content (including the practical annexes and tools) is considered immediately applicable in your teaching practice? (1 - 5)

Yes
No

22.1 If NO, please explain what else should be included in the material, in order to make it more useful.

23. Additional comments to the questions in Part 3:

Part 4: General closing questions

Very innovative
Innovative to some extent
Not innovative

Yes
No
Unsure

Yes
No
Maybe

There are required fields in this form marked .